|
source:
http://www.hrw.org/reports/1999/india/India994-09.htm#P1695_354939
The practice of devadasi, in which a girl, usually before reaching
the age of puberty, is ceremoniously dedicated or married to a deity
or to a temple, continues in several southern states including Andhra
Pradesh and Karnataka. Literally meaning "female servant of god,"
devadasis usually belong to the Dalit community. Once dedicated,
the girl is unable to marry, forced to become a prostitute for upper-caste
community members, and eventually auctioned into an urban brothel.
The age-old practice continues to legitimize the sexual violence
and discrimination that have come to characterize the intersection
between caste and gender. The patrons of the devadasis are generally
from the higher castes because those from the devadasis own castes
are too poor to afford to [pay] for the rituals_ In many cases a
patron kept many girls and the number of girls used to be a yard
stick of the status of that man. This system of patronage has given
way to [a system of] commercial prostitution in the populated big
cities. [218]
Activists involved in the Dalit women's movement explain that the
nexus between caste and forced prostitution is quite strong and
that the devadasi system is no exception. Most Indian girls and
women in India's urban brothels come from lower-caste, tribal, or
minority communities. Like other forms of violence against women,
ritualized prostitution, activists believe, is a system "designed
to kill whatever vestiges of self-respect the untouchable castes
have in order to subjugate them and keep them underprivileged."
[219] By keeping Dalit women as prostitutes, and by tying prostitution
to bondage in rural areas, upper-caste men reinforce their declaration
of social and economic superiority over the lower castes.
According to the Ambedkar Centre for Justice and Peace, a Canada-based
NGO:
Thousands of untouchable female children (between 6 and 8 years)
are forced to become maidens of God (Devadasis, Jogins, a Hindu
religious practice in Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka State, Maharashtra,
Orissa State, to mention only a few). They are taken from their
families, never to see them again. They are later raped by the temple
priest and finally auctioned secretly into prostitution and ultimately
die from AIDS. It is estimated by NGOs that 5,000 to 15,000 girls
are auctioned secretly every year. [220]
In an interview with Human Rights Watch, the head of an NGO active
in Karnataka explained that in her state the girl is offered to
the Goddess Yellamma in a village ceremony:
Earlier it was for priests, but now it is for high-caste men. They
used to live in the temples_ now anyone can use them including lorry
drivers_ Dreadlocked hair is taken as a sign from the Goddess Yellamma
that the girl is meant to be a devadasi. In a festival, a marriage
ceremony takes place between the girl and god. The eldest lady of
the devadasi community ties the mangal sutra [marriage necklace].
In some ceremonies the girl wasparaded almost naked. The girl is
then given some money but still works in the fields. She lives separately
in the village and is used by all the men, including Dalit men.
[221]
In 1992 the Karnataka state government passed the Karnataka Devadasi
(Prohibition of Dedication) Act and called for the rehabilitation
of devadasi women. Like many laws aimed at protecting women and
lower castes, the act suffers from a lack of enforcement. Moreover,
the police themselves have been known to use devadasis. As the Karnataka
activist explained, the law works to the disadvantage of women because
it criminalizes their actions and not the actions of their patrons.
Police will even go so far as to demand sex as a bribe: "They will
threaten to file charges under the act if the woman says no." [222]
Their perceived status in society, as women who are supposed to
serve men sexually, also makes it more difficult for devadasis to
approach the police for help: "When a devadasi is raped, it is not
considered rape. She can be had by any man at any time." [223]
In reviewing India's third periodic report to the U.N. Human Rights
Committee, submitted under Article 40 of the International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) in July 1997, the Human Rights
Committee regretted "the lack of national legislation to outlaw
the practice of Devadasi, the regulation of which is left to the
states," and added that "it appears that the practice continues
and that not all states have effective legislation against it."
The committee emphasized that the practice was incompatible with
the ICCPR and recommended that "all necessary measures be taken
urgently" toward its eradication. [224]
|